It might seem like I am taking the easy way out by staying
on the fence about globalization, but I really can’t decide if I think it is
purely good or bad. Overall, I don’t think
it is possible to say that globalization has entirely positive or negative
effects alone. I think that there are
benefits of globalization that are absolutely vital to the world economically,
politically, and culturally. Without globalization,
countries wouldn’t be so well-rounded and diverse, and world trade wouldn’t even
exist. Countries are dependent on each
other for resources and goods that aren’t available in some places. This trade helps boost individual country’s
economies as well as the global community’s.
Before reading the articles, I thought the good aspects of globalization
outweighed the bad. However, the author
of the no side of the argument included a myriad of examples proving that there
are indeed “dark sides” to globalization. It provides proof of the dangers of
unipolarity and globalization working together in the world. The arguments it used against globalization
were really convincing in that it shows how good, beneficial global relations bring
along negative interactions more often than not. Despite the multiple important benefits of globalization,
because of this negative view that I read, it is hard for me to see past these bad
outcomes and focus solely on the good.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.